Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 26, 1990No. 791, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Rudeara Bailey, was convicted by a Dorchester County jury, presided over by Judge Donald F. Johnson, of first-degree felony-murder. Upon this appeal, she raises the following five contentions:

1. That the State’s use of peremptory challenges to strike black jurors offended the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment;

2. That the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the conviction;

3. That Judge Johnson erroneously failed to give a limiting instruction about the use of a defense witness’ prior inconsistent statement;

4. That Judge Johnson…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Jefferson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Khaliq Khan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Mejia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API