Legal Opinion

Jefferson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1993No. 92-CF-309PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Jefferson was convicted of distributing cocaine.1 He raised an entrapment defense, asserting that the police “coerced him to do this act.” On appeal he contends that the government used its peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner, in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and that the evidence was insufficient to permit the jury to find that he was predisposed to distribute drugs. Although we agree that the procedure employed by the trial court in considering the Batson claim was not what it should have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tursio v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JeantyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Copeland v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API