Mejia v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
With this appeal, we encounter a second generation of issues spawned by Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). As we move from the simple bi-polar world of black and white into the subtler grays, it becomes, as some predicted from the beginning, increasingly apparent that, at worst, we are irreversibly adrift on a slippery slope with no foreseeable stopping place short of the elimination of the peremptory challenge. At best, we are sentenced to at least a decade of playing a diverting ethnological parlor game called “Who is What and How Do We Know…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Mejia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Brashear v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Gilchrist v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Ball v. MartinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.