Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Shackleford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1970No. 7012SC360PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

When a motion for directed verdict is made under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the trial judge must determine whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and giving to it the benefit of every reasonable inference which can be drawn therefrom was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Magnolia Apartments v. Hanes, 8 N.C. App. 394, 174 S.E. 2d 828 (Filed 24 June 1970). The directed verdict, in this sense, is similar to the motion as of nonsuit in the practice of this State before 1 January 1970.

Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Stowe Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Harrill v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Magnolia Apartments, Inc. v. HanesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. SATTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Pergerson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Gibson v. UsseryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Scott v. KikerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Roanoke Chowan Regional Housing Authority v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API