Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Moser

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1979No. 7815SC466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Relying on the “best evidence rule,” defendants argue that part of the plaintiff’s testimony was improperly admitted. This reliance is misplaced. Plaintiff was allowed to testify, over objection, to the number of men he probably used on the job, the actual footage of pipe used, and the number of hours spent grading. These facts, and others, had been recorded by plaintiff in small notebooks as the job progressed, and after the bill was prepared the notebooks were thrown away. Defendants contend that plaintiff should have been required to produce the notebooks where plaintiff kept…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Farmer v. ChaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Whitehurst v. . PadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Lewis v. Salem Academy and CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Lewis v. Salem Academy and CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Drain v. United Services Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. City of Burlington v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Drain v. United Services Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API