Legal Opinion
Denardo v. Bergamo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 18, 2005No. SC 17200PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*502 Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether grandparents, who were granted the right of visitation with respect to a minor child pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-592 prior to this court’s decision in Roth v. Weston, 259 Conn. 202, 789 A.2d 431 (2002), must satisfy the jurisdictional and substantive requirements set forth in Roth when a custodial parent has moved to modify or terminate the visitation order. The intervening plaintiffs, Richards. Denardo, Sr., and Patricia Denardo,3 appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Janet…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. IBAN C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Fish v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.