Legal Opinion
Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 21, 2019No. 3:16-cv-01990Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SIMON MUJO and INDRIT MUHARREMI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. 3:16-cv-1990 (VAB) v. JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Simon Mujo and Indrit Muharremi, on behalf of a class of over 100 Jani-King franchisees (collectively “Plaintiffs”), allege that Jani-King International, Inc., Jani-King, Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Jani-King”) unlawfully classified them as independent contractors and were…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford A/s/o Jt International Holdings, B v. V. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Concord Transportation, Inc., Defendant-Cross-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.