Legal Opinion

Shepherd Ex Rel. Estate of Shepherd v. Michelin Tire Corp.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 25, 1997No. 2:92-cr-00089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

The court has already notified counsel in the above-entitled case of its intention to grant the motion in limine filed by defendant, Michelin Tire Corporation (“Michelin”), seeking to preclude the testimony of Dr. Kenneth Laughery (“Laughery”) proffered by plaintiffs, Lee Shepherd, Sr., as Administrator of the Estate of Lee Shepherd, Jr., deceased, and Jesse J. Shepherd (“the Shepherds”). Because plaintiffs thereupon informed the court that they cannot realistically proceed without Laughery’s testimony and that the court’s ruling is tantamount to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,892 John Richards, as Conservator, Etc. v. Michelin Tire Corp., the Budd Company Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Yarbrough v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. In Re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated IIDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. United States v. Albert LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scheman-Gonzalez v. Saber Mfg. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Williams v. Michelin North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API