Legal Opinion

Camden Gas Corporation v. Camden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

It has always been the practice of this court to permit the parties, at any time before final decision, to supply omitted portions of the record which have not been brought up on appeal and which are essential to the correct decision of the case. It has also become the established rule of the court, where it has acquired jurisdiction of the case on appeal by the filing of a certified copy of the judgment or decree in the case within the time prescribed by statute, to allow appellant to perfect the record within a reasonable time.

We do not think that § 2 of act 327 of the Acts of 1923,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of El Paso v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Sample v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Caudle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Searcy County v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. B-W Acceptance Corp. v. TerrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. O'Daniel v. the Brunswick Balke Collender CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API