Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Turner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

'Counsel for appellant invokes a rule against the clerk of the court because he refused to file a purported transcript in the above entitled case. The clerk refused because the transcript was not tendered to him within sis months next after the rendition of the judgment in the circuit court, as required by § 2140 of Crawford & Moses’Digest.

Counsel for appellant claims the delay was occasioned by the circuit court in failing sooner to overrule his motion for a new trial. The time for appeal runs from the rendition of the judgment, and not from the overruling of the motion for a new trial.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chatfield v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Oxford Telephone Manufacturing Co. v. Arkansas National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Moore v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Durben v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Evans v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Camden Gas Corporation v. CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Sheffield v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Winn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Hogan v. BrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API