Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Daniel v. the Brunswick Balke Collender Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1938No. 4-5038Published

1DissentMcHaNey, J.

Appellee secured a judgment against appellant in the trial court. On the overruling of his motion for a new trial, he prayed and was granted an appeal to this court, and filed a supersedeas bond. He failed to perfect his appeal to this court within six months, and after six months appellee filed a transcript of the record and moved to affirm the judgment under Rule YII of this court. This relief has been granted by the majority and, in doing so, they have expressly overruled Sample v. Manning, 168 Ark. 122, 269 S. W. 55. From this action, I respectfully dissent.

Appellee’s only purpose in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feild v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Bank of El Paso v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Sample v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Spratlin v. HallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  5. Camden Gas Corporation v. CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API