Legal Opinion

DeLapp v. Xtraman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 23, 1987No. 86-1364PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

On June 11, 1985, appellant Betty Jean DeLapp, as executor of the estate of Paul Erwin DeLapp, initiated the present products liability action, seeking compensatory damages under a theory of strict liability for Paul DeLapp’s fatal injuries which allegedly resulted from his use of a defective hoist. The petition alleges the hoist was manufactured by Xtraman, Incorporated (hereinafter Xtraman I), a Louisiana corporation, sometime prior to 1980. Appellee, Xtraman, Incorporated (hereinafter Xtra-man II), is a Georgia corporation which allegedly purchased substantially all Xtra-man…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Guzman v. MRM/ELGIN WILLCOX & GIBBS, INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Nissen Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LpSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API