Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberto Cervantes-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-50113PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Per curiam

Roberto Cervantes-Flores (“Cervantes”) appeals his conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Cervantes argues that the district court erred in: (1) denying him the opportunity to present a necessity defense to the jury; (2) refusing to exclude statements he made to a border patrol agent before receiving Miranda warnings; (3) admitting a certificate of nonexistence of record in violation of his Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. United States v. FelizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. United States v. Brian K. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court · 2006

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API