Legal Opinion

State v. Treadway

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1975No. 7528SC327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues that the count in the bill of indictment which alleges the forgery is fatally defective because it “fails to recite in explicit language that the instrument was apparently capable of effecting a fraud.” This argument is wholly without merit.

The instrument alleged to have been forged in this indictment was a check drawn on the account of one Howard M. Gorham in the Northwestern Bank, Asheville, North Carolina. This is the type instrument used in daily transactions for the purchase and sale of merchandise. Upon its face it was apparently capable of effecting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API