State v. Moffitt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the court’s refusal to grant his motion for a continuance and also the court’s refusal to allow his motion to quash the bill of indictment on the ground he was not afforded his constitutional right to a speedy trial. These assignments of error are overruled.
Defendant’s motion for a continuance was grounded upon the fact the public defender who was first assigned as defense counsel was involved in another court trial and unable to represent defendant on the day this case was calendared for trial. It affirmatively appears, however, that another attorney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Claude Franklin Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North Carolina, Claude F. Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MoffittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.