Legal Opinion

Country Joe, Inc. v. City of Eagan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1996No. C8-95-2289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants brought this action to challenge the legality of a road unit connection charge imposed by respondent City of Eagan and to seek reimbursement. Following discovery, the parties brought cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of the legality of the charge. The district court awarded summary judgment to respondent, concluding that the road unit connection charge was not an illegal tax. We conclude that respondent lacks statutory authority to impose the charge, and we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent City of Eagan (Eagan) became aware in the late 1970’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Country Joe, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API