Legal Opinion
Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. Tidwell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2010No. 07-2211PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Copar Pumice Company, Inc. (“Copar”), proceeding under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq. (“APA”), appeals the district court’s denial of its petition for review concerning the Notice of Noncompliance that the United States Forest Service (FS) issued to Copar concerning its pumice mining activities. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
Copar operates the El Cajete pumice mine on four unpatented mining claims located within the Jemez National Recreation Area in New Mexico. Pursuant to a written settlement…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Rosenfield v. HSBC Bank, USACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.