Legal Opinion

People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2017No. 14-4151 & 14-4165PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners (“PETPO”) challenges a regulation promulgated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS” or “Service”) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). The challenged regulation prohibits the “take” of the Utah prairie dog, a purely intrastate species, on nonfederal land. The ESA defines “take” as meaning “to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19).

The district court granted summary judgment for PETPO on the ground that neither the Commerce Clause nor…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. PamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Griffith v. El Paso County, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API