Legal Opinion
WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2015No. 12-1508, 12-1509PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service”) conveyed to a consortium of local governments a strip of land (“the corridor”) for the construction of a parkway. Its decision was challenged on various environmental grounds by several parties, including WildEarth Guardians, Rocky Mountain Wild, the Town of Superior, and the City of Golden (collectively, “Appellants”). The district court affirmed the Service’s actions, and Appellants brought their claims here. They assert that the Service violated the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge Act (“the Rocky Flats Act” or…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Aposhian v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Donald Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. James D. Aljian Kirk Kerkorian Tracinda CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Env't v. BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Banuelos-Galviz v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.