Legal Opinion

Norristown Ford Co. v. Metropolitan Auto Dealer, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1957No. Appeal, No. 289PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

In this action in assumpsit, tried without a jury, the finding was for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,210 and judgment was entered in that amount.

These are the facts which we must take as established by the finding of the .trial court: On July 17, 1952, the plaintiff , sold to the defendant three-used *647automobiles for a total sum of $3,065. Upon payment by defendant of $2,065 of the purchase price, the three cars were delivered to the defendant and were accepted by it. The judgment here on appeal is for the unpaid balance of the purchase price, of $1,000 with interest. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Vandegrift v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Howarth Et Ux. v. GilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Stein v. SlomkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Brenner v. PecarskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shafer v. A. I. T. S., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Brandywine Motor Cars Inc. v. Scott, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1987
  5. Donadio, R. v. Fonner Insurance Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API