Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeal, No. 190PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This proceeding was brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act1 to ascertain the coverage or non-coverage of a fire insurance policy. The appellant-plaintiff, beginning in 1943, annually issued to defendant its policy insuring certain buildings, identified as numbers 18, 19 and 20, on defendant’s land devoted to industrial uses. The policy specified the amount of insurance on building number 20 as $100,000. In August, 1946, a fire damaged part of a building on this land; defendant contended that the building damaged was part of number 20 and claimed a loss…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Capital Bank and Trust Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Schoenbrun v. NettrourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Stofflet & Tillotson v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Nesbitt v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Stabler v. RamsaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API