Bradley v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that the Federal Protective Service (FPS), a division of the General Services Administration, wrongfully reduced plaintiffs’ pay when it retroactively applied the Law Enforcement Availability Pay Act of 1994 (LEAP), Pub.L. 103-329, § 633 (Sept. 30, 1994) (codified, inter alia, at 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542(d) & 5545a). This case stands on defendant’s motion filed September 25, 1996 to dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for summary judgment. We conclude that subject-matter jurisdiction exists but that defendant is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James E. Brown v. Secretary of the Army. Wellington Mitchell v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crowley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Horvath v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Vanderpool v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.