Legal Opinion

Bradley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 19, 1998No. 95-711 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs allege that the Federal Protective Service (FPS), a division of the General Services Administration, wrongfully reduced plaintiffs’ pay when it retroactively applied the Law Enforcement Availability Pay Act of 1994 (LEAP), Pub.L. 103-329, § 633 (Sept. 30, 1994) (codified, inter alia, at 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542(d) & 5545a). This case stands on defendant’s motion filed September 25, 1996 to dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for summary judgment. We conclude that subject-matter jurisdiction exists but that defendant is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. James E. Brown v. Secretary of the Army. Wellington Mitchell v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crowley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Horvath v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Vanderpool v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API