Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Vedder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from, Washington District Court. Replevin, brought by Bliss against Vedder, to recover a printing press, type, etc. Trial at the April Term, 1883, and judgment for defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion, of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action of replevin, brought by J. W. Bliss against James S. Vedder, to recover certain personal property hereafter mentioned. The case was tried before the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. It appears from this agreed statement of facts that on December 19, 1882, the defendant, as constable, held an execution issued on an ordinary judgment for debt against the plaintiff, and then *58levied the same on one Washington Hoe printing press and certain type and other articles used in connection with the press in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patten v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  2. Buckingham v. BillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Jenkins v. McNallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Sallee v. WatersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  5. Spooner v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Betz v. MaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Reeves & Co. v. BascueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Flaxman v. Capitol City Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. In Re OetingerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API