Jenkins v. McNall
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Smith District Court. Replevin for one Gordon job-printing press, brought by Jenkins against McNall. Trial, and judgment for the defendant, at the May Term, 1881, of the district court. The plaintiff brings the ease here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hokton, C. J.:
This was action of replevin for one Gordon job-printing press, brought by Will. D. Jenkins, as plaintiff, against C. E. McNall, as. defendant. The case was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury. The court rendered a judgment for the defendant, to which plaintiff excepted.
The question in the ease is, whether the printing press was exempt to the plaintiff. Sec. 3, ch. 38, p.,437, Comp. Laws of 1879, provides:
“Every person residing in this state, and being the head of a family, shall have exempt from seizure and sale upon any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guptil & Hinton v. McFeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Patten v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Buckingham v. BillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Bequillard v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Sallee v. WatersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. ShakunNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Dowd v. HeusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Lampe v. Iola Bank & Trust (In Re Lampe)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Bliss v. VedderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- In Re OetingerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.