Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mancini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1962No. Appeal, 163PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

In this appeal defendant, relying upon Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (June 19, 1961), seeks to set aside Ms burglary conviction and sentence on the ground they were the result of the use of evidence illegally obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure. The appeal comes here on a statement of the case under Rule 37 of the Superior Court in which the following facts are set forth: “From January 1959 to April 1960 the Presidential Apartments in Philadelphia was the site of a series of burglaries in which the tenants’ premises were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. CAMPBELLSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stoner v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. DaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. ScullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. State v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. United States ex rel. Mancini v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API