Legal Opinion

State v. Richter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1965No. 39225PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

133 N.W.2d 537 (1965)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Lester L. RICHTER, Appellant.

No. 39225.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 19, 1965.

Vincent P. Courtney, St. Paul, for appellant.

Walter F. Mondale, Atty. Gen., J. Earl Cudd, Sol. Gen., St. Paul, V. W. Lundquist, County Atty., Willmar, for respondent.

OTIS, Justice.

Defendant seeks to vacate a 1951 conviction for grand larceny, claiming that an unconstitutional search and seizure induced his plea of guilty. Thus, we are confronted again with the issue of whether Mapp v. State of Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, 84 A.L.R.2d…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. State v. KotkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Campos v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API