Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. CAMPBELL

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1961No. Appeals, 32, 33, and 34PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

The three appellants were indicted separately under section 718 of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 P.S. 4718, and were convicted on the third count only, of unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously using a certain instrument and means, the nature of which instrument and means was unknown, upon certain women with the intent to procure miscarriage of them.

The Commonwealth presented all of the evidence that was offered in the case. All three defendants elected not to testify nor to offer any other evidence on their behalf.

The Commonwealth’s evidence discloses the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. PalermoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. DownerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. United States ex rel. Campbell v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ensor v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API