Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1931No. Docket No. 7577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
Plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover a certain fund in the sum of $25,000. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed.
Stephens & Company was a corporation transacting a stock-broker’s business in San Francisco. During that time it was banldng with the defendant. Under the rules of the defendant, Stephens & Company was required to keep a balance of $39,000 at all times. As from the beginning Stephens & Company maintained its general commercial account with the defendant bank. For some time prior to February 20, 1925, Stephens & Company had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Noble v. LearnedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chazen v. Centennial BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Blackmon v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Boston Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Desert Bermuda Properties v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.