Legal Opinion
Rohde v. Nock
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 21, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The reasons of appeal relate to the refusal of the court to charge as requested, to claimed error in the charge given, and to the exclusion of certain evidence.
Upon the trial the plaintiff offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved the following facts: That on May 17th, 1922, he was duly licensed to drive an automobile in this State, and was then the owner of an automobile, registered in his name as required by law; that on this 17th day of May he was operating his automobile on a public highway in the city of Hartford known as Connecticut Boulevard, and when he had reached a point…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Temple v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Bernier v. Woodstock Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Salemme v. MulloySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Fournier v. ZinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Murphy v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Cramer v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.