Legal Opinion
Salemme v. Mulloy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The plaintiff moved that the verdict be set aside as against the evidence. An examination of the evidence discloses that the jury could reasonably have found the issues for the defendant.
The reasons of appeal relate to the refusal of the court to charge as requested, and to claimed error in the charge given. Under the facts claimed to have been proved, the decedent might have been found to have stood in one of three relations to the defendant: As a passenger riding by invitation; as a trespasser on the car without the knowledge of the defendant; as a trespasser on the car with the defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bunnell v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Kalmich v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Murphy v. Derby Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Gett v. IsaacsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Fagerholm v. NielsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- McVicar v. WR Arthur & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Hall v. SeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Quackenbush v. VallarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.