Legal Opinion

Humble & McLendon v. Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Cotjht by

William Rogees Clay, CommissioneR

— Affirming.

Plaintiffs, L. H. Humble and D. R. McLendon, partners doing business under tbe firm name of Humble & McLendon, brought this suit against defendant, W. B. Wyatt, to recover damages for Ms breach of a contract of purchase of a certain quantity of railroad ties. A demurrer was sustained to the petition and the petition dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal.

It appears from the petition that plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract, by which defendant purchased from plaintiffs not less than 30,000 and not more than 50,000 white…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hollingsworth v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Barrett v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Campbell Printing-Press Co. v. ThorpU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crest Coal Co., Inc. v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith v. Crimson Ridge Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API