Legal Opinion

Crest Coal Co., Inc. v. Bailey

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

The issue before the court is whether the movants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been granted by the trial court.

The respondent, George Bailey, is a third party beneficiary of a coal land lease agreement between his stepfather, Oscar Wire-man, and Crest Coal Company. The relevant portion of the agreement provides that Crest Coal will employ respondent and others “if they so desire a job with Crest Coal Company, Inc., and if their work is satisfactory to the Company . . . .” After approximately nine months of employment with movant, respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eichstadt v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Hoskins v. Hoskins Ex Rel. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  3. Hollon v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. Kidder Press Co. v. J. V. Reed & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Independent Life Insurance Co. of America v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kiran K. SHAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Shah v. American Synthetic Rubber Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moore v. Environmental Construction Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Smith v. Bear, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  5. Smith v. Crimson Ridge Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API