Southwick v. Planning Board

The questions in this subdivision appeal are (i) whether the plaintiff’s claim that the subdivision parcel has no right of access over the roads serving an adjacent subdivision (of which the plaintiff’s land is a part) is sufficient to support his standing to maintain the appeal; and (ii) whether his claim requires annulment of defendant Plymouth planning *316board’s (board) approval of that subdivision. We conclude that the plaintiff’s claim is not merely sufficient to support his standing, but establishes that the subdivision is without the right of access on which it depends. We accordingly…