Legal Opinion

Boudreau v. Coleman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 19, 1990No. 89-P-873PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

The defendants own a 25.5 acre parcel (the locus) in Waltham. They would like to develop it in accordance with a subdivision plan showing forty-one house lots. According to the proposed plan, the only access from the proposed subdivision to Lexington Street, a public way, would' be over Chesterbrook Road and Stanley Road, private ways perpendicular to each other. The plaintiffs, owners of property abutting those ways, sought in the Land Court a declaration that the defendants have no easement, by express reservation or by implication, to pass from the proposed subdivision over Chesterbrook…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Cheever v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Martin v. Simmons Properties, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Stew-Mc Development, Inc. v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API