Legal Opinion

State v. Scheffelman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1987No. 86-465PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

The Scheffelmans appeal from their convictions of felony possession of dangerous drugs and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia in the District Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Was the State’s notice of intent to seek increased punishment properly allowed?

2. Were the defendant’s motions for mistrial properly denied?

3. Does the evidence support Terrie Scheffelman’s conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia?

4. Should the defendants’ felony convictions have been reduced to misdemeanor convictions?

5. Are instructions Number 6…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. State v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. CloseMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. MeaderMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. KleinMontana Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PartinMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. SeamanMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ArthunMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API