Legal Opinion

State v. Arthun

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1995No. 95-086PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Defendants Ellen and Bruce Arthun were charged by information with possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal possession of dangerous drugs. After a nonjury trial in the District Court for the Sixth Judicial District in Park County, the Arthuns were found guilty of all charges. The Arthuns appeal the District Court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence and the court’s verdict. We affirm the order and judgment of the District Court.

There are three issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err when it denied the Arthuns’ motion to suppress the package of marijuana?

2. Was there…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. FlackMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hagan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. VeisMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. EllisMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API