Legal Opinion

Wright v. Murray

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 2007No. COA07-100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In North Carolina, when a plaintiff recovers ten thousand dollars or less in a personal injury suit, the trial court may allow a reasonable fee to the plaintiff’s attorney “upon a finding by the court that there was an unwarranted refusal by the defendant insurance company to pay the claim which constitutes the basis of such suit.” 1 Here, the defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering $25,000 in attorney fees following the jury’s award of $7,000 to the plaintiff. Because the trial court’s order is supported by the requisite findings of fact and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Briley v. FarabowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. In Re GleisnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Poole v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Matter of WhisnantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryson v. CortCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API