Legal Opinion

In Re Gleisner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-1585PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULLER, Judge.

Christine Gleisner (respondent), the mother of the two juveniles in question (Sarah and Isaac), appeals from the 17 May 1999 order of the trial court finding both juveniles neglected. For the reasons set forth herein we remand.

The Onslow County Department of Social Services (petitioner) first investigated the family on 2 June 1997 after receiving a report that Sarah had been left at home unattended. Stacy Specht, a social worker employed by petitioner, went to the family’s trailer home that Sunday afternoon and found Sarah, approximately eight years old at the time, alone in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Matter of HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NA v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In re C.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In re P.L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. In re T.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. In re S.C.R.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. In re T.H.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API