Smith v. Citizens Savings Bank
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcGeehan, J.
Motion to examine the defendant bank is granted as to items 3, 4, 6 and 12 and denied as to other items except that as to item 6 the examination will be confined to the defendant bank. The defendant bank admits ownership and control (paragraphs sixth and seventh of the complaint). The admission by the defendant bank that its codefendant was in control as alleged in paragraph eighth of the complaint does not invalidate the admission of control of the defendant bank under the seventh paragraph of the complaint, even though the codefendant denies control upon information and belief. The other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Van Campen v. Olean General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Phillips v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Davidson v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mack v. President & Trustees of the School Board of Briarcliff ManorNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Lovero v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Wodetzky v. Board of EducationCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939