Legal Opinion

Shaw v. City of Kalispell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1959No. 9967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE CASTLES:

This is an action for an injunction brought by the six named plaintiffs against the City of Kalispell, its mayor, aldermen, and clerk, in connection with a special improvement district created for the purpose of participating with the Montana *286Highway Department and United States Bureau of Public Roads in the improving, widening and reconstruction of sections of U. S. Highway No. 2- and U. S. Highway No. 93, within the-boundaries of the City of Kalispell and therefore a part of its street system. The plaintiffs allege that they brought the action on behalf of themselves…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Bradbury v. NagelhusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Poundstone v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hurst v. Town of MartinsburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sweetman v. Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. Baston v. BastonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Madden v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. McMillanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Estate of French v. KellyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API