Bradbury v. Nagelhus
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE CASTLES:
This appeal arises out of a dispute between long-time neighboring ranchers who signed a writing, agreeing to become “equal pardners [sic] in the purchase” of adjoining grazing leases and ranch lands. Technically, what they undertook is the form of quasi-partnership activity called a joint adventure. Inter se, joint adventurers are obligated as trustees. The litigation which developed is brought on the theory of a constructive trust.
The parties began their venture by each contributing $1,000 to bind a $19,500 one-year purchase option covering the lands and leases. They…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Girard v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Noble v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Guignon v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Platts v. PlattsMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Hamman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Berger v. MeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.