Nashville v. Sutherland & Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlistek, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
The defendant in error, by joint conveyance of its members, Wm. Sutherland and *336{Jhas. A. Graves, in deed executed June 15, 1888, •conveyed to plaintiff in error a right of way through their lumher-yard for a ' sewer-pipe, to •drain into the river a pond lying near the property of Sutherland & Co., for the consideration of $150, and the further consideration expressed in a •clause of the deed made by Sutherland and Graves, to he hereinafter quoted, which deed was accepted hy the city, the cash consideration paid, and the pipe laid and a valve constructed.
The terms of the contract were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Crocker v. Town of ManchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.