Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented here is whether a Florida Drainage District admittedly not liable for torts as such under Florida law, Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage Dist., Fla., 82 So.2d 353, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 958, 76 S.Ct. 348, 100 L.Ed. 833; Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128, 103 So. 422, is liable to a Railway on an indemnity-hold-harmless agreement in a canal right of way easement granted by the Railway 28 years before. The District Court held that it was not and accordingly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 12,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nuveen v. GreerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Molwin Inv. Co. v. Turner, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Becker v. Keokuk WaterworksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Arundel Corp. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Halifax Drainage District v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. County of Crisp of the State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.