Legal Opinion

People v. Schunke

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1934No. Crim. No. 2545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

From a judgment which was rendered against him pursuant to his conviction of each of the crimes of robbery and of burglary, as well as from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, defendant has appealed to this court.

No question is raised by appellant regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. But since his defense to the charges upon which he was tried consisted in an unsuccessful attempt on his part to estab*546lish an “alibi”, in that at the time when the offenses were committed he was at a place remote from the scene of the crime, to wit: many miles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. State v. RemickWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API