Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1965No. Crim. 4912PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery. On appeal he contends (1) that a statement he made to a police officer was received in evidence contrary to the rule expressed in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 [84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977], and People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361]; (2) evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure was used at his trial; (3) his impeachment by proof of a prior felony conviction denied him due process of law; (4) the district attorney and trial judge were guilty of prejudicial misconduct, and (5) that the trial court erred in its ruling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Minniear v. TorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API