People v. Stone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellant was convicted of robbery. On appeal he contends (1) that a statement he made to a police officer was received in evidence contrary to the rule expressed in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 [84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977], and People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361]; (2) evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure was used at his trial; (3) his impeachment by proof of a prior felony conviction denied him due process of law; (4) the district attorney and trial judge were guilty of prejudicial misconduct, and (5) that the trial court erred in its ruling…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Minniear v. TorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.