People v. Clark
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial and from an order made after ' judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appellant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state’s prison for the term of twenty years, and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, and also from an order made after judgment. This latter order will be first noticed.
Several instructions were requested to be given to the jury by the prosecution and the defendant re*36spectively, upon each of which the action of the court, whether given, refused, or modified, was duly indorsed. In addition the court gave several oral instructions of its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. BrothertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. Ah Lee DoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. FairWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. StokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.