Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Ladd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 30, 1990No. C1-90-1627PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an attorney discipline matter in which the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) charges respondent with misappropriation and trust account violations, misappropriation of partnership funds, client neglect, and noncooperation with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility. Respondent did not file an answer to the petition for disciplinary action, and on August 31, 1990, we ordered the allegations contained in the petition deemed admitted. We agree with the Director’s recommendation of disbarment.
I
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of Discipline of ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Discipline of KraemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against WeemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. HessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.