Legal Opinion

Mays v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2003No. 49A02-0212-PC-1049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, Ahmed Mays, seeks review of the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Upon appeal, Mays presents three issues for our review, which we restate as: (1) whether Mays received ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) whether *1020his guilty plea violates double jeopardy principles; and (3) whether the trial court properly advised Mays of his rights at his guilty plea hearing.

We affirm.

On November 30, 1999, Mays pleaded guilty to Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Serious Violent Felon, as a Class B felony,1 and Carrying a Handgun Without a License, as a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. John Jorman, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Kristopher Lambright v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Mays v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Olvera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API