Legal Opinion
Mays v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2003No. 49A02-0212-PC-1049Published
1Opinion of the Court
790 N.E.2d 1019 (2003)
Ahmed MAYS, Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
No. 49A02-0212-PC-1049.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
June 30, 2003.
Ahmed Mays, Carlisle, IN, Appellant pro se.
Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Richard C. Webster, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Appellant, Ahmed Mays, seeks review of the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Upon appeal, Mays presents three issues for our review, which we restate as: (1) whether Mays received ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) whether his guilty…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.