Legal Opinion

Meenan v. Meenan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1955PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

In this action for a separation instituted on February 23, 1955, plaintiff-respondent applied to Special Term for alimony and counsel fees pendente lite. Attached to and incorporated in his answering papers, defendant-appellant submitted an exemplified copy of a Nevada divorce decree (reciting the jurisdictional grounds) which had previously been granted to him, on substituted service, by a court of that State on January 6, 1953, before the date of commencement of the action herein. This was prior to the effective date of section 1170-b of the Civil Practice Act. From the order of Special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Fischer v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dominick v. DominickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ernst v. ErnstNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Goldstein v. GoldsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Iverson v. IversonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Schaefer v. SchaeferNew York Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API